MR. MASATSUGU ASAKAWA
President
Asian Development Bank
Dear President Asakawa;
Good day.
According to the WHO[1] the need for clinical testing and quarantine measures is considered critical to slow the spread of the virus. You are well aware Pres. Asakawa, those Asian countries especially lower-income countries have fragile and limited health care systems. Unfortunately with struggling fiscal health, and lack of public health infrastructure, some Asian governments are opting to use the heavy-handed method of police and military crackdowns to enforce quarantine protocols, violating human rights and basic political freedoms. As this letter is being written, activists and journalists in Pakistan, Bangladesh, the Philippines among many others are being persecuted, silenced, or jailed for speaking the truth and exposing government failures. The space for civil society's voice in such places is shrinking and is now on the verge of being suffocated. To this end we thank you for allowing us the space to raise these critical issues during your ADB AGM 2020. Aside from pandemic Asia is facing a severe debt crisis and the overarching haunting impacts of the climate crisis.
The clock has not stopped ticking, and reducing GHG emissions is imperative to keep the global temperature below 1.5 degree Celsius rise.
ADB Projects in India, Nepal, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh have been raised on Safeguards violations to respective operations departments and management over the last year. Issues on non-payment of compensations, lack of meaningful consultation, and adverse impact on workers have been repeatedly flagged to banks with a limited response on the ground. Pres. Asakawa, the ADB’s Safeguards delivery has not met up to the standards of the policy. Through this letter the NGO Forum on ADB we would like to bring to your attention the following issues surrounding ADB’s response to debt, climate, and safeguards and we will look towards your immediate action and leadership on helping resolve these challenges.
Debt
The global debt of 263 trillion USD boils down to a 32,500 USD debt burden of each individual for all 7.5 billion people inhabiting planet earth. According to the World Bank’s recent report on global debt[2] it has direct effect, influencing steep depreciation of local currencies. Unable to make debt payments due to lockdown industries and work, governments are struggling to ensure people have access to housing, food, critical health care. Unless funds are accessible without conditions Asian governments will be unable to provide emergency services to its people.
In this context, the ADB has announced a USD 20 billion-recovery package to address the crisis. It is sad to see that the grant allocation of the recovery page is only 2 billion USD and the majority of the fund will operate mainly as loans. Considering the nature of this global pandemic, debt relief has been considered as a possible solution for Asian governments to stay afloat and free up funds for immediately addressing public health and economic recovery concerns. Both the IMF[3] and G20 have committed to debt relief measures as of May 2020[4], but the scale and scope of the measures are limited. The debt relief needs to be much wider in order to be effective and should include the MDBs, and other bilateral banks in the effort. To this end we urge the ADB to immediately issue an order to stop the collection of ALL loan payments from DMCs for 2020, so that they may have access to unconditional funds for immediate public health care and economic recovery.
ADB’s Climate Responsibility
The ADB Energy Policy 2009 is outdated and heavily embedded in coal and fossil fuels and in complete contradiction to the Paris Agreement of reducing global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius. New energy policy is urgently needed with the following provisions –
The new ADB Energy Policy should be explicitly Paris-aligned and should pursue and promote a 1.5°C Pathway—reaching a global CO2 emissions decline of 45% from 2010 levels by 2030, and net-zero CO2 emissions by mid-century—without false solutions.[5] The P1 Scenario outlined in the IPCC’s Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C eliminates false solutions while ensuring that the 1.5°C temperature goal is met. ADB should also work with experts in identifying investment opportunities for renewable alternatives that are consistent with this goal.
ADB's Country partnership strategies (CPS) should be updated to ensure alignment with the Paris Agreement, and projects should be screened following CPS and national decarbonization pathways.[6] As the primary platform for designing ADB operations towards delivering development results at the country level, existing CPS should be reviewed and updated to mainstream climate change considerations, specifically incorporating the 1.5°C goal.
The ADB must declare a full commitment to divest from all coal mining and coal power projects—including coal mined for captive use of a power plant, coal projects considered energy-efficient or adopting a carbon capture storage or other mitigating measures, and using co/tri-generation technology. ADB should once and for all stop financial flows to projects that allow for the burning of coal—the single largest contributor to the climate crisis.
The ADB must adopt a stringent emission performance standard for all power generation and CHP projects that will effectively divest other fossil fuel projects. ADB should focus its limited resources on meeting the low-carbon transition. Thus, it should review the emission performance standard of energy projects in its DMCs, and adopt a standard that will phase-out investments in other fossil fuels.
The ADB must set out strict exclusion criteria for fossil gas projects, permitting only those determined to be a necessary bridge fuel for a DMC’s low-carbon transition. The IPCC’s SR1.5 provides a strict timeline for the drastic reduction of fossil gas projects under the P1 Scenario: -25% from the 2010 level by 2030, and -74% from 2010 level by 2050.
ADB Safeguards
NGO Forum on ADB has been engaging the ADB on its Safeguards Policy Statement and its implementation for the last decade. Issues of displacement in the Cambodia Railway Rehabilitation Project, Visayas Base Load Coal project, and its impact on public health and air pollution, Tata Mundra Power Plant impact on marine ecosystems are some of the flagship cases which have been brought to the bank’s attention. In all these cases the fundamental area of concern is the lack of meaningful consultations with affected communities in the project design phase of the project cycle.
This continues to be a glaring weakness in ADB’s Safeguards delivery and has been cited by its IED’s evaluations in 2014, 2016, and the recent evaluation of 2020. Since 2013 the NGO Forum on ADB during each of the management sessions during the AGMs would look to the former ADB President to recommit to ‘No Dilution’ of the current Safeguards Policy Statement SPS 2009, and he did so without fail till his last term.
We hope under your leadership we will see you uphold this critical commitment of ‘No Dilution’ to the SPS 2009 as well. The current policy does have its limitations – the language is very weak in ensuring private sector operations to be compliant to the SPS, this has also been validated by the IED 2020 report recently posted on their website. Financial Intermediaries especially have been grossly negligent of their SPS deliverables and there remain severe gaps in monitoring and evaluation from ADB on the FI borrowers. On the issue of Country Safeguards Systems the ADB has spent over 40 million USD in strengthening capacities in Indonesia, Kyrgyzstan, Sri Lanka etc., yet not a single CSS is optimal for SPS delivery. We hope the ADB will continue to take responsibility for delivering its own SPS until CSS achieve equivalency as articulated in the SPS 2009.
COVID19 has also shown how vulnerable people are to health threats due to lack of adequate social protection and access to health care. To this end the most affected groups would be the project affected women, especially indigenous women, children, and people with disabilities. The other vulnerable sector coming to the forefront is the scores of workers in the project sites. Nam Ngiep 1 Vietnam witnessed an oxygen cylinder explosion leading to the death of 6 workers, yet the scope of the SPS could not even afford the families compensation let alone ensuring safety standards in the workplace. The upcoming SPS review should include binding safeguards for women, children, and people with disabilities.
In the Gojra Shorkot Road Project, which was funded by ADB through an FI, the workers were left unpaid for over 6 months of wages, with several incidents of deaths due to occupational hazards. The subcontracting companies closed their doors, and the FI borrower could not hold them accountable, leaving the unpaid workers helpless without justice. The ADB pointed towards the SPS which failed to give any respite to the workers due to its ambiguous language on labor and non-binding wording on FI compliance. The SPS must have binding language on Core Labor Standards as a principal safeguard pillar.
Pres. Asakawa, while ‘No Dilution’ is retained, we hope that the current gaps within the SPS policy are critically addressed in the upcoming review through a robust, open, and holistic consultation process with NGO Forum on ADB and civil society at large.
The coming year will be of change and new ideas to help build a post COVID19 sustainable, healthy, and greener world. To do so, the bank must bring independent civil society voices into its planning and policy formulation. It is through listening to the voices on the ground that the bank will be able to address the development question, which it intends to solve. Pres. Asakawa, it is the people and the environment that are the true test of development outcomes, not the fractions of GDP rise. We hope the ADB is learning from this bitter experience of its misdirected export-oriented development paradigm and is looking to turn to meet the needs of vulnerable people and communities.
The former president had committed publicly that all policy reviews by ADB will have civil society meaningfully consulted; we would not expect anything less from you. We wish you a productive and constructive AGM and hope your leadership can bring us to a better, inclusive, sustainable, and equitable Asia.
Respectfully,
Mr. Rayyan Hassan
Executive Director
NGO Forum on ADB
Endorsed by:
350.org, Asia
350.org Pilipinas, Philippines
ADAB (Association of Development Agencies in Bangladesh), Bangladesh
Akhuwat-E-Kissan Pakistan, Pakistan
Aksi! for gender, social and ecological justice, Indonesia
Alyansa Tigil Mina (ATM), Philippines
Asian Peoples Movement on Debt and Development, Asia
Association des Démocrates Thaïlandais Sans Frontières, France
Bangladesh Working Group on External Debt (BWGED), Bangladesh
Bank Information Center, United States of America
Buliisa Initiative for Rural Development organisation (BIRUDO), Uganda
BWI Asia Pacific, Philippines
Center for Energy, Ecology, and Development, Philippines
Center for Environmental Justice, Sri Lanka
Change Initiative, Bangladesh
CLEAN (Coastal Livelihood and Environmental Action Network), Bangladesh
Collective for Economic Justice, India
Committee for the Abolition of Illegitimate Debt, South Asia
Community Development Friend (CDF), Bangladesh
Community Empowerment and Social Justice (CEMSOJ) Network, Nepal
Development Synergy Institute (DSI), Bangladesh
DIGNIDAD Coalition, Philippines
Digo Bikas Institute, Nepal
Environmental Public Society, Armenia
Environics Trust, India
Equitable Cambodia, Cambodia
Freedom from Debt Coalition, Philippines
Friends of the Earth Japan, Japan
Friends of the Earth US, US
Gender Action, Global
Global Social Justice, Belgium
Growthwatch, India
Hape Development and welfare Association , Pakistan
Human Rights Law Network, India
Indian Social Action Forum, India
Initiative for Right View, Bangladesh
International Accountability Project, United States
International Association of People's Lawyers, Australia
International Center for Not-for-Profit Law, Tajikistan
Legal Rights and Natural Resources Center-KsK Friends of the Earth, Philippines
Life Haven CIL , Philippines
Lumiere Synergie pour le Developpement, Senegal
Nash Vek Public Foundation, Kyrgyzstan
National Development Programme (NDP), Bangladesh
Nepal Integrated Development Initiatives (NIDI), Nepal
NGO "Youth Group on Protection of Environment" , Tajikistan
NGO Forum Cambodia, Cambodia
NIDAN, India
Observatoire d’Etudes et d’Appui à la Responsabilité Sociale et Environnementale (OEARSE), Congo
Oil Change International, International
Oil-Workers' Rights Protection Organization Public Union, Azerbaijan
Oyu Tolgoi Watch, Mongolia
Pakistan Fisherfolk Forum, Pakistan
Phenix Center for Economic Studies, Jordan
Program on Alternative Development, University of the Philippines Center for Integrative & Development Studies, Philippines
Progressive Plantation Workers Union, India
Recourse, The Netherlands
Rivers without Boundaries
SPELL-Sustainability and Participation through Education and Lifelong Learning, Philippines
Sri Lanka Nature Group, Sri Lanka
Urgewald, Germany
WomanHealth Philippines, Philippines
Youth For Environment Education And Development Foundation (YFEED Foundation), Nepal
Cc:
ADB Executive Directors
ADB Alternate Executive Directors
Vice-President for Knowledge Management and Sustainable Development
Vice-President for Private Sector and Public-Private Partnerships
Vice-President for Administration and Corporate Management
Vice-President for Finance and Risk Management
Vice-President Operations 1
Vice-President Operations 2
Chief of Energy Sector Group, Sustainable Development and Climate Change Department
Director General, Sustainable Development and Climate Change Department
Director, Safeguards Division
Director-General of Independent Evaluation at ADB
Director, Thematic and Country Division
ADB's NGO and Civil Society Center (NGOC)
[1]https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/11/mass-testing-alerts-and-big-fines-the-strategies-used-in-asia-to-slow-coronavirus
[2]M. Ayhan Kose, Peter Nagle, Franziska Ohnsorge, and Naotaka SugawaraGlobal Waves of Debt: Causes and Consequences, World Bank Report, 2020
[3] https://eurodad.org/covid19-debt-FAQ
[4]https://www.devex.com/news/g20-imf-deliver-on-debt-relief-but-more-is-needed-experts-say-97021
[5] IPCC, Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C, Summary for Policymakers, 14.
[6] WRI, Toward Paris Alignment, 6.
Download the letter here.
Comments